Dual-Class Shares Unloved But Don’t Write Them Off Too Quickly


By and large, dual-class shares are unloved by investors and PF bloggers because the structure creates a double standard that gives one class of investors unfair voting power over another. ThickenMyWallet recently wrote a post on dual-class shares titled “You’re a fool if you buy…“:

The primary disadvantage of a company with a dual-class share structure is there are no effective checks and balances to management excesses such as excessive executive compensation… The larger issue is that companies with dual-class structures tend to be poorer performing stocks than their single-class structure counterparts (ask someone who invested in shares of Ford).

Yesterday, The Dividend Guy followed up with “Dual-class shares suck“:

From a statistical perspective, it would be better to hold the single-class stock in the industry you are looking at, compared to the dual-class company.

Both bloggers singled out controlling shareholder, Conrad Black, whose extravagant lifestyle single-handedly brought Hollinger International down to its knees. While both bloggers put forth rationales with strong merits, ThickenMyWallet did offer a glimpse of hope suggesting good stocks do exist in the dual-class structure.

Admittedly, I haven’t paid much attention to dual-class structure although I may have to adjust my stock selection process. So far in my endeavor, I’ve found no reasons to shy away from *all* dual-class stocks even though the door is open for management to act in their personal interests. My view is that result should speak louder than share structure, so I tend to stick with management with a strong track record of delivering excellence.

There are many profitable dual-class Canadian stocks with smoking-hot cashflow, and management teams aren’t afraid to share the wealth with generous dividend policies. Reitmans, for example, is a debt-free high quality retailer with a long history of dividend increases. Another one is Teck Cominco which hiked their dividend 10-fold since 2004. AGF Financial also recently boosted their payout by 25%. All three stocks have so much money, at least 3 years worth of dividend is parked in cash or cash equivalents.

Perhaps dual-class structures do raise some eyebrows, but a meticulous screening process should weed out the looters.

 

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Each company has to be evaluated on its own merits. Dual-class shares are just another item on the check list to identify and evaluate.

Best Wishes,
D4L

Keep in mind that there are companies where the privileged class of share ARE available to the public (albeit illiquid and/or price premium).

RET vs RET.A
TCK.A vs TCK.B

Thanks for the link. One point of analysis in dual class shares is always who holds the other (good) class? If it is a family, who continue to be in the day to day operations, it tends to raise red flags for me. Junior is, by in large, a worse operator than the founding father of the company. Ford may be the prime case study of what happens to a family controlled company as control is passed down to generations.

FJ,
I agree I certainly would’t exclude a company from my portfolio based solely on a dual-class structure and in some cases I think a family run business can have it’s advantages, as the family fortune depends on the success of the business (of course there is always the chance that some of the family members are idiots though).

Guess we have to examine it case by case as Dividends4Life alluded to, and that includes looking down at the family tree.

Fair and good comments - given the choice between two investments in the same industry I would still choose the one without the dual-class structure. I want the company to work in my best interest, and more importantly for my vote to mean something!

Thanks for the mention and the link!

One possible upside to dual class shares is that you can buy shares of a company like Teck Cominco a little more cheaply than you otherwise might be able to, since there is less of a takeover premium built into the stock price.

[…] response to my post on dual-class shares, Financial Jungle tempered my post by saying that certain companies do deserve a look even if they have a dual-share […]