H&R REIT Looks Cheap



Warning: copy() [function.copy]: Filename cannot be empty in /home/finaecom/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mytube/mytube.php on line 220

Sign

Sure, you can invest in this 3-bedroom Vancouver old timer yielding a meager 3.5% to 4% CAP, but why torment yourself? Instead, you can indulge yourself with an 8.2% yield by owning these sexy office towers within H&R REIT’s portfolio:

Sign

As you may recall, the market has been punishing the Real Estate Income Trust (REIT) sector for much of 2007 and into early 2008, while the average yield is inching up each day. No one knows how long the spanking will persist, but as of this moment, the whole sector is roaming into bargain territory as many REITs are yielding well above 7%. That is far more attractive than the 3.74% offered by Canada 10-year bond, a popular yardstick to judge how attractive the REIT sector is relative to a guaranteed income investment.

I have taken an interest in H&R REIT - the largest Canadian office REIT and the overall second largest Canadian REIT behind RioCan. Today, HR.un is distributing an annualized $1.44 or 8.2% based on closing price of $17.49. That looks pretty cheap to me, and insiders agree. CEO Thomas Hofstedter and directors collectively scooped up $3 million worth of units in Nov & Dec at prices above $19. I picked up half a position at $18.05, but if we’re lucky enough, the trust will trade below $16 for a 9% yield. Otherwise, I’m happy to hold on to the half position for the long haul.

Back in 1999 when euphoric investors were dumping REITs while flocking to the ecstasy of dot-com land, HR.un traded briefly above a 12% yield at a time when 10-year Canada bond was yielding 6.25%. Outside of this anomaly, HR.un’s yield was around 10%, or a 4% premium above Canada bond. Today, the market is giving us a second chance to own this REIT at a 4.5% premium above Canada bond.

HR owns a portfolio of 35 office, 125 industrial, and 142 retail properties across Canada but principally in Ontario. Some of their well known creditworthy tenants include Bell Canada Inc., TransCanada Pipelines, Bell Mobility, Telus , Royal Bank, Public Works of Canada, Nestle, Canadian Tire, Finning International, Circuit City, Rona, Lowe’s, Shell Oil Products, Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Chapters, Famous Players, Walgreens, Sobey’s and Shoppers Drug Mart.

The trust has steadily bumped their distribution over the years, rising from $1.03 in 1998 to $1.44 today, or an annualized 3.8% growth. (They just increased distribution by 5.1% this month.) Together with the 8.2% yield, that’s a total return of 12%. Not too shabby for a hard asset class that’s traditionally weakly-correlated with the stock market. And if you’re into DRIP, HR offers a 3% bonus if you reinvest the monthly distribution to buy more units.

Real estate, by nature, is a highly leveraged asset class. HR’s average mortgage term is 10.4 years, but this is paired with an average tenant lease duration of 12.2 years with only 12.8% of leases expiring by the end of 2012. Nothing is bullet proof, but mortgage payments appear well covered. Nimble management was quick to snap up cheap buildings in a hot real estate market. New properties acquired during the first 3 quarters of 2007 cost the REIT a weighted average mortgage interest of only 5.67%, giving them an expected levered return on equity invested of 12.1%.

The only thing peculiar about HR is that their payout ratio actually exceeds 100%. The portfolio released $133.2 million of cash during the first 3 quarters of 2007, but distributed $133.7 to unitholders. This practice appears normal judging from other landlords in the REIT space. For example, bellwether REIT, RioCan has a shocking 116% payout according to a TD Waterhouse report. My only explanation is that REITs with a deeper pipeline can afford to over distribute in the short-term; RioCan has 10 properties in the pipeline versus HR’s 3.

** This is not a recommendation to buy. I’m not a REIT expert. If you have an opinion on HR or REITs in general, I’d love to hear about it.

For more info, please visit www.hr-reit.com.

There are different debt management companies, which want you to free from debt. You can learn from different websites that how to pay debt easily and can provide you every type of debt help. Now you can get online insurance leads by different companies and also online mortgage services. Low bank home loan rates are being offered by a number of banks. The home insurance is also available at cheap rates making it easy to pay installments.

 

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

How does this work for the long term?
The EPS is steadily decreasing while the payouts are increasing. In ‘06 the EPS was 0.79 while the payout was 1.33. Doesn’t seem sustainable to me.

I was thinking of edging into REITs.

I was thinking originally of RioCan since it’s not a bad proxy for XRE but I’m wondering if VNQ (Vanguard REIT ETF) might be a better choice since I’d like to be diversified and increase US$ exposure.

Any opinions?

Earnings don’t reflect the true profibility of REITs because management depreciates [i]appreciating[/i] assets on paper to improve tax efficiency. In REITs, earnings are for the taxman to see, not investors. For us, we care more about funds from operations.

Good read! REITs certainly have a place in my portfolio, though I am currently over-allocated at this time. Their high yields help to offset the lower yields from traditional “dividend” companies. it is all about balancing risk and returns.

Best Wishes,
D4L

Spooky. I’ve been looking at buying a rental property or properties for a while now. Then my wife saw the episode of “Holmes on Homes” where the tenants turned the rentap into a grow-op. We had a long conversation over the weekend that ended in me deciding to some researching on REITs. Thanks for doing all the legwork for me!

Is HR the trust with the highest yield right now? How about the rule that you should not buy the one with the highest yield, but the one with higher yield?

dropby - can you share the link that shows HR.un having the highest yield in the real estate space?

I don’t think the REIT sector is finished correcting. I’ll wait for the sector to stabilize. I did a quick look at First Capital (FCR) and I like it better than HR.un, plus you get the DTC. No rush to buy yet as I haven’t researched these companies thoroughly.

UnclePickle - I have a lousy track record in timing the bottom. I wouldn’t know when the REIT sector stabilizes. Looking back over the previous 10 years, none of the REIT rallies were preceded by stabilization in prices, so I don’t see why it should be different this time.

In my opinion and fast forwarding the next 10 years, the greatest risk isn’t whether you bought at $1 or $2 cheaper, but whether you invested in REITs at all around these bargain prices.

Keep us posted once you’re done researching FCR. I like to know if you still hold the same opinion and also the rationale behind it.

What is the NAV on H&R? Riocan has, on and off, been trading below its NAV which puts it into bargain territory.

Warning bells always go off when the payout ratio is above 100%. This means its losing cash, issuing more shares (robbing Peter to pay Paul), or it doesn’t have too much room to increase distributions.

Unfortunately there isn’t a standardized NAV formula. According to REIT expert, Dennis Mitchell of Sentry Select, HR.un is trading at around 30% discount to NAV. Using the same formula, Riocan is trading at ~18% discount to his $24 to $25 NAV estimate.

Payout ratios must always be taken in context of the business. REITs have stable creditworthy tenants who sign on to long-term leases and pair them with long-term mortgages. I’d worry about payout ratio for energy trusts whose cashflow fluctuates with commodity prices.

BTW, I like Riocan too. If you’re happy with its 116% payout, you must be thrilled over HR’s 100% payout.

Nice Snag JG,

As I just disclosed in a posting I recently picked up CWT.UN & CUF.UN for exposure to real estate for my portfolio. HR was on my watchlist when I started out, but decided instead for now that the NAV discount for these two protected my downside a little more than HR. Give us a heads up if you decide to add anything retail related.

Nurse - Interesting… Where do you lookup your NAV values for these 3 trusts? According to those Sentry Select guys, HR’s NAV is estimated to be around $25.

FourPillars - For some odds reasons, my spam filter keeps capturing your posts. Sorry for the delay.

I wonder if Canadians are at a disadvantage to invest in US REITs only because we probably cannot capture the Return of Capital. Just a wild guess. I haven’t done any work on them.

As a starting point I usually look up Sentry’s NAV estimate (Dennis Mitchell) and compre to the TDSI Morning Action Notes (TDW). TSDI ranks CWT.UN, but not CUF or HR.

I still do a NAV the old fashioned way (tedious) using this as a guide: http://www.nareit.com/portfoliomag/05mayjun/feat2.shtml (Mechanics of Nav)

But I have to admit that they’re normally not exact numbers when you figure in the assumptions you have to make for cap rate, so you have to do your best to get a rough estimate of the discount/premium.

Hi, FJ,

What do you think about HRP? HRPT Properties Trust. This US stock right now has a dividend rate of over 11%.

dropby - Unfortunately I’m not familiar with US REITs at all. Canadian REITs are keeping me busy enough, although I can imagine there must be a whack of cheap REITs down South too.

[…] post by Financial Jungle Guy Related Posts: A Diversified 4.69% Yielding […]

MG - The MLS page didn’t retain your search criteria. Can you outline the criteria here? Thanks.