Switch On The Consumers’ Waterheater Tab


You have to be a Vulcan to remain unrattled by the November blizzard that knocked the TSX index off by nearly 8%. All of a sudden, the market has become pessimistic, and rightfully so as many indicators are foreseeing a recession looming. It will suck if a recession storms in uninvited. After all, who will spoil us with dividend increases when cash flows aren’t there?

While many investors have their tongue frozen to the credit crunch pole, the conservative ones are now keeping their portfolios warm and toes-curled under a blanket of utility, consumer stable and health care stocks; ones that deliver essential products and services to the general population irrespective of the market cycle we’re in.

What are some of our basic needs? Food, water, electricity and heating. Last week, I highlighted Borelax Power Income Fund, which owns 10 power plants in Quebec and the state of New York. Staying on a similar theme, I recently invested a position in the Consumers’ Waterheater Income fund (CWI.un).

If you live in Toronto, you recognize that heat and hot water are two of the most elementary needs. CWI rents out 1.4 million natural gas-fired water heaters to 83% of residence in the Enbridge Gas Distribution network within the Greater Toronto area. A boring business, isn’t it? Which is why this investment is so exciting in my view, because mundane businesses tend to come with less baggage, and it’s easier to evaluate if they’re cheap.

CWI’s rental fees are bundled in the customers’ natural gas bills. Brilliant! Not only do they provide essential services, the fees are buried deep inside the monthly gas utility bills which everyone almost always pay in auto-pilot mode. Very few businesses are more vital and stable than CWI; S&P agrees. The trust receives a AAA credit rating and SR-2 stability rating given its conservative balance sheet and recession proof character.

CWI’s minimal capital expenditures are mostly geared toward renewing 5% or 6% of its asset base in a given year, because a typical waterheater has a 15-year lifespan. In addition, CWI has little operating risks. A partnership agreement with Direct Energy Marketing Limited means that nearly all of CWI’s service support is outsourced in exchange for 35% of the aggregate rental revenues.

What more can you ask for in an income trust? Capital expenditures are minimal, revenue stream is stable, customer base is growing, share count is in check, and bank balance is growing.

In fact, between 2003 and 2006, CWI’s vault swelled steadily from $17 millions to $39 millions without diluting shares or eroding debt-level. With the business flush with cash, CWI recently plunked down $10 millions as a 25% down payment to acquire Toronto Hydro Energy Services units for $41 million. This represents a 6% increase to the total installed waterheaters.

The growth potential doesn’t end there. According to their website:

Beyond the existing service arrangement, the Direct Energy relationship has the potential to bring new growth opportunities to the Fund. As Direct Energy expands its home services footprint, the opportunity arises to rent water heaters to these customers. In addition, should Direct Energy successfully establish a significant base of rental water heater customers elsewhere in Canada, the Fund has right of first refusal to acquire it.

Management foresees the rental rate to rise in tandem with the rate of inflation. Between that and the growing asset base, distribution should improve by about 5% a year. Each CWI unit delivers an annual distribution of $1.29. Based on Friday’s closing of $14.93, that’s a yield of 8.64%. Anything above a 9% yield for CWI is cheap in my book.

If you happen to purchase CWI, consider the tax consequence: CWI’s distributions are not as tax friendly as most other trusts. 97% is treated as interest income with only 3% is return of capital. It’s better to hold the trust in a tax-deferred account such as RRSP. Short of that, you could hold the trust in a non-registered account of the spouse in a lower tax-bracket.

 

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Brilliant! I feel warmer already…

Mike

This one got away from me on speculation that they would be acquired earlier this year or else I probably would have bought it. For now, I am not interested in adding any more trusts.

Good buy!

MG - Many investors can blame a few insolvant income trusts for attracting bad connotation to the entire sector, but I still find this a rewarding space IF you’re picky. Since we are both fundamental investors, the structure of the business isn’t nearly as important as the business itself. What I’m trying to say is, we can never have too many trusts in our portfolio. :)

Many trusts are dead easy to value. We have a good idea how much Consumers’ Waterheater is worth, but try pinpointing Citigroup’s intrinsic value. No way!

I am trying to strike a good balance in my portfolio between share price growth and income. While I do realize that they are tied together sometimes, I feel that i am already weighted heavily in trusts with my exposure to YLO.UN and IPL.UN. These are great for the income but I don’t expect much share price growth or growth in income in the short to mid term with these names.

I’m assuming you meant equity growth, not share price growth.

Income = Growth by my definition.

For example, the Bolerax power utility trust I purchased earlier has little upside nor downside potential, but it does distribute over 13% on my purchase price.

If the unit price doesn’t appreciate over time, fantastic! I can reinvest the 13% to grow my equity, thus my distribution, by 13% annually. And that will compound nicely against the 10% long-term average from the stock market. This is why I don’t necessary shy away from trusts that don’t grow their distributions as quickly as others, as long as the price is right.

I did mean equity growth which should really translate into share price growth roughly.

I gree with your assessment except for one caveat. Since income actually leaves the company it is dislocated from true growth of the business. The only way to theoretically translate $1 of income into growth is to invest 100% into a DRIP that DRIPs fractional shares. If there are any commission fees incurred on re-investment or inefficiencies like those involved in a synthetic drip then income loses out. These would all apply to my specific situation.

Bah! :) Fractional shares are overrated.

Each Bolarex share is only 7 bucks. If you’re 2 bucks short, go on margin if you have to, and pay it back with next month’s distribution.

The dist. would always need to be a multiple of $7 or your would get cash kicked out…

Also, you know I invest mainly in a non-reg = TAX!

Fair enough for non-registered accounts, especially for Consumers’ Waterheaters as their distributions are not as tax-friendly.

Good luck, mg.

FJ