<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Claymore S&#038;P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share ETF</title>
	<link>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/</link>
	<description>A Vancouverite's journey to financial freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David Lee</title>
		<link>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/#comment-21</link>
		<author>David Lee</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>Question on the efficiency of preferred shares:

I was under the impression that since preferred shares offer dividends at regular intervals, they will make a better dividend-income generating vehicle.  Should I antipicate a significient difference in dividend yield between commmon and preferred shares?

Thank you.  I like your articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question on the efficiency of preferred shares:</p>
<p>I was under the impression that since preferred shares offer dividends at regular intervals, they will make a better dividend-income generating vehicle.  Should I antipicate a significient difference in dividend yield between commmon and preferred shares?</p>
<p>Thank you.  I like your articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Jungle Guy</title>
		<link>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/#comment-22</link>
		<author>Financial Jungle Guy</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>David,

You're right about the dividend tax credits offered by preferred shares.  Preferreds are inefficient in that they're thinly traded.  At a given moment, the spread between the bid and ask price is wide, so you have to watch out not to overpay the stock.

Since dividends from common shares have the element of growth, investors are likely to bid up the price, thus depressing the yield.

You can find an excellent overview on preferreds here.  Click the Preferreds link on the left menu.

http://www.shakesprimer.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about the dividend tax credits offered by preferred shares.  Preferreds are inefficient in that they&#8217;re thinly traded.  At a given moment, the spread between the bid and ask price is wide, so you have to watch out not to overpay the stock.</p>
<p>Since dividends from common shares have the element of growth, investors are likely to bid up the price, thus depressing the yield.</p>
<p>You can find an excellent overview on preferreds here.  Click the Preferreds link on the left menu.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shakesprimer.com/" >http://www.shakesprimer.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Loree</title>
		<link>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/#comment-23</link>
		<author>Monty Loree</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://financialjungle.com/2007/04/23/investing/claymore-sptsx-canadian-preferred-share-etf/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Hello Again,

RE: Canadian Tour of Personal Finance blogs  #2
I've scheduled the next tour on May 7, 2007.
The Money Diva has accepted to be the host for this event.

Check out http://www.canadian-money-advisor.ca for more details.

I've set up a new email for the tour
tour (dot) canadian (at) gmail (dot) com

BTW... did you see that &lt;a href="http://www.canadian-money-advisor.ca/archives/2007/04/google+is+worlds+most+valuable+brand++%2466+4+billion+usd.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google's "Brand" is worth $66.4 Billion?&lt;/a&gt;
Google's "Brand" is worth $66.4 Billion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Again,</p>
<p>RE: Canadian Tour of Personal Finance blogs  #2<br />
I&#8217;ve scheduled the next tour on May 7, 2007.<br />
The Money Diva has accepted to be the host for this event.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.canadian-money-advisor.ca" >http://www.canadian-money-advisor.ca</a> for more details.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve set up a new email for the tour<br />
tour (dot) canadian (at) gmail (dot) com</p>
<p>BTW&#8230; did you see that <a href="http://www.canadian-money-advisor.ca/archives/2007/04/google+is+worlds+most+valuable+brand++%2466+4+billion+usd.html" >Google&#8217;s &#8220;Brand&#8221; is worth $66.4 Billion?</a><br />
Google&#8217;s &#8220;Brand&#8221; is worth $66.4 Billion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
